<Back>

 

MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON

September 10, 2007 - 7p.m.

Call to Order

The Regular Meeting of the Mayor and Council of the Borough of Madison was held on the 10th day of September 2007. Mayor Kerkeslager called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Committee Room of the Hartley Dodge Memorial, Kings Road, in the Borough of Madison.

Statement in Compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act
The Borough Clerk read the statement pursuant to the Open Public Meetings Act:

"In compliance with the Open Public Meetings Act, adequate notice of this meeting of the Council was provided by publishing a copy of the meeting notice in the Madison Eagle and Morris County Daily Record, posting a copy on the bulletin board at the main entrance of the Hartley Dodge Memorial, and filing a copy in the office of the Clerk, all on January 4, 2007. Copies of said Notice were made available to members of the general public."

Roll Call
The Borough Clerk called the roll and the following acknowledged their presence:

Mayor Ellwood R. Kerkeslager

Council Members:

Mary-Anna Holden
Astri J. Baillie
Donald J. Bowen
Carmela Vitale

John M. Elias

Robert H. Conley

Also Present:

Joseph Mezzacca, Jr., Borough Attorney

Marilyn Schaefer, Borough Clerk

Raymond M. Codey, Acting Administrator

AGENDA REVIEW

One Contract Matter was removed from the Executive Agenda and will be carried to the September 24, 2007 meeting. One Contract Matter was added to the Executive Agenda.

Reading of Closed Session Resolution

Mr. Elias moved:

RESOLVED, that the meeting be adjourned to an Executive Session to consider the following matters:

EXECUTIVE SESSION MINUTES (1)

Date of public disclosure 60 days after conclusion, if disclosure required.

PERSONNEL MATTERS (3)

Date of public disclosure 90 days after conclusion, if disclosure required.

CONTRACT MATTERS (9)

Date of public disclosure 60 days after conclusion, if disclosure required.

Seconded: Ms. Baillie

Vote: Unanimous voice vote

Reconvene in Council Chamber
Mayor Ellwood R. Kerkeslager reconvened the Regular Meeting at 7:50 p.m. in the Council Chamber with all members present. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited by all.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

Mrs. Vitale moved approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of August 27, 2007, with the following amendment to discussion #4 on Visualization Software:

………..the Downtown Development Commission (DDC) has offered to fund Phase 1 the purchase in the amount of $11,000.00.

Ms. Baillie seconded the motion, which passed with the following roll call vote recorded:

Yeas: Ms. Baillie, Mr. Bowen, Mrs. Vitale, Mr. Elias

Nays: None

Abstain: Mrs. Holden, Mr. Conley

Mrs. Vitale moved approval of the Minutes of the Public Session of the Special Executive Meeting of September 4, 2007. Mr. Bowen seconded the motion, which passed with the following roll call vote recorded:

Yeas: Mrs. Holden, Mr. Bowen, Mrs. Vitale, Mr. Elias, Mr. Conley

Nays: None

Abstain: Ms. Baillie

Ms. Baillie moved approval of the Executive Minutes of August 27, 2007. Mrs. Vitale seconded the motion, which passed by voice vote with Mrs. Holden and Mr. Conley abstaining.

Mrs. Vitale moved approval of the Special Executive Minutes of September 4, 2007. Mr. Elias seconded the motion, which passed by voice vote with Ms. Baillie abstaining.

GREETINGS TO PUBLIC

Mayor Kerkeslager made the following comments:

Recognition

Mayor Kerkeslager gave recognition to Madison residents and former Madison residents who were killed during the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center in New York. Every year Morris County holds a major September 11th ceremony and remembrance; this occurred last evening and it was very well attended; the County remembers by name everyone from Morris County who was killed in the attack on September 11th. The County is continuing to move forward and hopefully before next year’s ceremony, the ability will be expanded to recognize everyone who was killed on that day in 2001; the mechanism for doing that is being funded by private donations. Mayor Kerkeslager encouraged everyone to keep track of ceremonies announced in the Daily Record and Star-Ledger. The Mayor focused on recognizing the individuals from Madison who were killed; those who have visited Madison’s memorial lately know there is a plaque which was dedicated in May 2002; the memorial was dedicated by the Borough of Madison in eternal memory to the Madisonians who lost their lives due to the acts of terrorism against our nation on September 11, 2001:

James L. Crawford

Donald Peterson

Timothy R. Hughes

Jean Peterson

Patrick McGuire

Peter West

Mayor Kerkeslager asked all present to join in a moment of silence in recognition of Madison victims, Morris County victims and all the victims of the World Trade Center disaster. (For background on Madison victims, see minutes from tribute of September 11, 2006.)

PROCLAMATION

Mayor Kerkeslager read and presented to Dr. James Hollenbach the following Proclamation:

P r o c l a m a t i o n

of the

B o r o u g h o f M a d i s on

Proclaiming

KIDS DAY AMERICA/INTERNATIONAL™

September 22, 2007

WHEREAS, the health and well-being of children is our responsibility; and

 

WHEREAS, the safety of our children is a significant concern for parents, community leaders and health caregivers; and

 

WHEREAS, environmental welfare is of universal concern and deserves the utmost attention; and

 

WHEREAS, if started in childhood, proper health, safety and environmental habits can be maintained for a lifetime, producing a valued member of society and enhancing our community;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ellwood R. Kerkeslager, Mayor of the Borough of Madison, do hereby proclaim September 22, 2007 as KIDS DAY AMERICA/INTERNATIONAL™ in Madison, New Jersey. I urge that this day be dedicated to the efforts of Doctors of Chiropractic services in helping to educate all citizens on the importance of health, safety and environmental issues affecting our youth and our community.

_______________________________________

Ellwood R. Kerkeslager, Mayor

September 10, 2007

 

Sister City Relationship with Marigliano

Marigliano has produced a version of their monthly magazine featuring all of the things that happened while Mayor Kerkeslager visited Marigliano; they gave a few copies of the magazine entitled "Follow Me Marigliano", which gives information, culture, curiosities, events, statistics, and is a city guide for work and free time in Marigliano. A special feature in the magazine is entitled "The Event – Marigliano-Madison, Special File for USA". A copy will be on file in the Office of the Clerk. They gave Mayor Kerkeslager a framed resolution and their "oath" to work together with Madison as sister cities to support education of children and cultural understanding between Marigliano and Madison on an ongoing basis.

REPORTS OF COMMITTEES

Community Affairs

Mrs. Holden, Chair of the Committee, made the following comments:

Mrs. Holden thanked Mayor Kerkeslager for his remembrance of September 11, 2001, and mentioned that tomorrow, if anyone is available at 9 a.m., there will be a quiet remembrance at the memorial in James Park.

On Wednesday, September 12, 2007, at 6:30 p.m., the Chamber of Commerce will have a business card exchange at the Provident Bank.

On Friday, September 14, 2007, at 5 p.m., there will be a reception at Madison High School honoring Korean War Marine veteran and legendary Madison football coach Ted Monica; please wear your maroon and gold if you attend; the game can be enjoyed afterward.

On Monday, September 17, at 10:15 a.m., the Senior Center will begin their regular season of meetings, which will include a barbecue in the parking lot afterward.

Mrs. Holden called Council’s attention to an interesting and extensive article in the business section of yesterday’s Daily Record entitled "Morris’ fields of dreams"; it focused on artificial turf, its cost and potential savings to towns; Mrs. Holden passed the article around.

Utilities

Ms. Baillie, Chair of the Committee, made the following comments:

As Liaison to the Open Space, Recreation and Historic Preservation Advisory Committee, Ms. Baillie reported that the Council received from the State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection, a letter indicating that the Madison United Methodist Church, 24 Madison Avenue, is being considered by the New Jersey State Review Board for Historic Sites for nomination to the New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places. As the Liaison to the Open Space Advisory Committee, Ms. Baillie was very excited about this and wished them well, as this is one of the things that the Advisory Committee is encouraging; they put together a pamphlet on conservation easements and historic easements; it is nice to see a private entity looking to preserve its history.

Health & Public Assistance

Mr. Bowen, Chair of the Committee, no report.

Public Works and Engineering

Mrs. Vitale, Chair of the Committee, no report.

Finance and Borough Clerk

Mr. Elias, Chair of the Committee, made the following comments:

Last Thursday the Morris County Municipal Joint Insurance Fund (JIF) held its 20th Anniversary event at Birchwood Manor; at that time, the JIF acknowledged Madison as one of the founding members for this program and presented Madison with a plaque and an attachment of a paper non-negotiable "check" in the amount of $3,562,121.00 representing the estimated savings Madison realized through its participation in JIF over the past 20 years. The JIF also specifically acknowledged and recognized for his hard work and many contributions to its success our very own Robert Kalafut, the Borough’s Chief Financial Officer; it is nice to see in this era of shared services one that really hit one out of the park and shows substantial benefits to the community.

Public Safety

Mr. Conley, Chair of the Committee, made the following comments:

Mr. Conley read a letter dated August 26, 2007, from Daisy Baker of Madison to Chief Atchison reporting that on Saturday, August 25th, she returned from a walk to find one of her smoke detectors ringing away and the Police and Fire Departments already at her rental apartment; they soon found that one smoke detector was old and not in working order, though ringing non-stop; without delay, Firefighter Brian Tappan took care of the situation while calming the resident; he went back to the Fire Department and returned very quickly with a new, working smoke detector which he installed; Ms. Baker thanked the Borough for being there and said how very fortunate Madison is to have such wonderful protectors! Ms. Baker gave a special thanks to Brian Tappan, who left one very grateful resident. Mr. Conley reminded residents that seniors who need assistance with smoke detectors should contact the Fire Department, who will help out.

The Fire Department was dispatched to East Hanover last Friday evening for a hazardous materials call; Madison firefighters, along with other area departments, assisted Morris County Hazmat; a chemical substance was released into the sewer system and was considered highly combustible; a gas meter was utilized to take measurements and a decision was made to flush the system; the readings gradually dropped and safety was restored; firefighters were on the scene for approximately five hours.

COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - None

INVITATION FOR DISCUSSION (1 of 2)

Mayor Kerkeslager opened the meeting to the public for their opportunity to ask questions and make comments. The Mayor asked that, upon recognition by the Chair, the person shall proceed to the lectern and give his/her name and address in an audible tone of voice, and print the same on the sheet provided for the record. He/she shall limit his/her statement to three (3) minutes or less.

 

Sam Cerciello, Park Avenue, referred to the Daily Record article about Eastern Builders and Liberty Mutual, asked about who issued change orders, and spoke about his request for copies of records (OPRA request) made on September 6, 2007, for which he is still waiting; Mr. Mezzacca explained how change orders are approved. Mr. Cerciello made critical statements and gave out figures; he stated that these are his own statements and are his own opinions. Mr. Mezzacca explained that he himself negotiated with the surety and an agreement was made on September 4, 2007; the surety started today on takeover of the Fire & Police building project and have a completion date of 180 days from the signing of the agreement.

 

Agenda Discussions

09/10/07-1 VISUALIZATION SOFTWARE DEMONSTRATION

Two members of the software company were present and gave a visual demonstration of uses of the software for planned development in Madison; the Downtown Development Commission (DDC) has offered $11,000.00 to purchase Phase 1 of the software; this amount does not include photos or tree streetscape renderings; the Council will get some written answers to questions such as what, if any, DDC action is required; future investments needed; how the program would be implemented in departments; how it would be carried forward in the budget; who would be responsible.

09/10/07-2 MADISON PUBLIC LIBRARY CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST FOR COMPLETION OF DRAINAGE SWALE DESIGN PHASE

After a summary given by Library Trustee Mark Sheeleigh and Council comments, Mrs. Holden moved approval of the Library request to transfer $35,000.00 from the previously approved Library parking lot realignment study to the drainage ditch/swale stabilization design work, and increase funding by $24,000.00 to $142,000.00. Ms. Baillie seconded the motion, which passed with the following roll call vote recorded:

Yeas: Mrs. Holden, Ms. Baillie, Mr. Bowen
Mrs. Vitale, Mr. Elias, Mr. Conley

Nays: None

An ordinance is listed for introduction later in the meeting.

09/10/07-3 DRAINAGE AGREEMENT TOWNSHIP OF CHATHAM

Mr. Codey gave a summary of the request to authorize the Borough of Madison/ Chatham Township Interlocal Drainage Agreement; Mr. Codey spoke of a recent meeting with Councilwoman Vitale, Borough Engineer Robert Vogel and Borough Attorney Joseph Mezzacca, when Mr. Mezzacca was asked to finalize the subject agreement.

Mrs. Holden moved approval of the Drainage Agreement with the Township of Chatham. Mrs. Vitale seconded the motion, which passed by voice vote.

A resolution so authorizing is listed on the Consent Agenda.

09/10/07-4 CABLEVISION ORDINANCE

After comments by Mr. Mezzacca including that this ordinance gives Madison much more control over broadcasting meetings, Mr. Bowen moved approval of the Cablevision ordinance. Mrs. Vitale seconded the motion, which passed by voice vote.

An ordinance is listed for introduction later in the meeting.

09/10/07-5 AMEND ORD 7-2007 TO INCREASE FUNDING TO $50,000.00 TO PURCHASE NEW ENCLOSED GENERATOR FOR THE NORTH STREET SEWER PUMP STATION

Mr. Bowen moved approval of Superintendent of Public Works David Maines’ request for $50,000.00 to purchase a new enclosed generator for the North Street Sewer Pump station. Mrs. Holden seconded the motion, which passed by voice vote.

An ordinance is listed for introduction later in the meeting.

09/10/07-6 FIRE DEPARTMENT PAGERS

Mr. Conley moved approval of Fire Chief Atchison’s request to appropriate $6,000.00 from the Fire Department Trust Account for Fire Department pagers. Mrs. Holden seconded the motion. Pagers are needed for members in the volunteer division; current pagers are 10 years old and in need of replacement. There was no further discussion and the motion passed by voice vote.

An ordinance is listed for introduction later in the meeting.

09/10/07-7 INCREASE PLUMBING SUBCODE FEES TO 100% OF STATE FEE SCHEDULE

Ms. Baillie moved approval of Construction Code Official Russell Brown’s request to change plumbing subcode fees from 68% of the state fee schedule to 100% of the state fee schedule, and establish a minimum plumbing permit fee as previously recommended in 2006. Mrs. Holden seconded the motion, which passed by voice vote.

An ordinance is listed for introduction later in the meeting.

09/10/07-8 SUPPORT APPLICATION FOR FUNDING THROUGH THE DCA BALANCED HOUSING PROGRAM FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AT 22 CENTRAL AVENUE

Mrs. Vitale moved approval of Housing Authority Executive Director Louis A. Riccio’s recommendation to support the application for funding through the DCA Balanced Housing Program for the development at 22 Central Avenue. Mr. Conley seconded the motion, which passed by voice vote with Mr. Bowen abstaining.

A resolution is listed on the Consent Agenda.

09/10/07-9 RELEASE OF UP TO $500,000 FROM THE HOUSING TRUST FUND FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FIREHOUSE APARTMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED SPENDING PLAN

Mrs. Vitale moved approval of Housing Authority Executive Director Louis A. Riccio’s request for approval to release up to $500,000.00 from the Housing Trust Fund for the development of the firehouse apartments (22 Central Avenue) in accordance with the approved spending plan. Mr. Conley seconded the motion, which passed by voice vote with Mr. Bowen abstaining.

A resolution will be listed on the September 24, 2007 Consent Agenda.

09/10/07-10 AMEND HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE TO INCLUDE BOTTLE HILL HISTORIC DISTRICT

The Borough of Madison was notified by letter dated January 18, 2005, from the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection that the Bottle Hill Historic District, James Park, Madison Borough, Morris County was entered onto the New Jersey Register of Historic Places on December 7, 2004. It was then sent to the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., to be considered for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places.

The Madison Planning Board, on Tuesday, August 7, 2007, recommended that the Madison Governing Body adopt by ordinance the inclusion of the Bottle Hill Historic District in the Historic Preservation Ordinance.

Mrs. Vitale moved approval of the Planning Board recommendation. Mrs. Holden seconded the motion, which passed by voice vote.

An ordinance will be listed for introduction on the September 24, 2007 agenda.

09/20/07-11 Madison Borough – Sewer Ordinance

This ordinance was prepared by the Environmental Attorney and reviewed by Mr. Mezzacca. Mrs. Vitale moved approval of listing the Sewer Ordinance for introduction. Mr. Conley seconded the motion. There was discussion as to exactly what is prohibited and allowed to be introduced into the sewer system; things identified as questions should be taken back to the Joint Meeting for clarification; as to enforcement, how to identify someone who violates the ordinance; how it is intended to be enforced; the Superintendent of the Joint Meeting has the right to notify an owner to stop an actual discharge; upon advanced notice to the Borough, the Health Department could be notified; the recommendation to use the word "shall" rather than "may" within the ordinance as to enforcement by the Health Department was recommended.

At the conclusion of discussion, the motion passed with the following roll call vote recorded:

Yeas: Mrs. Holden, Ms. Baillie, Mr. Bowen
Mrs. Vitale, Mr. Elias, Mr. Conley

Nays: None

Ordinance 62-2007 is listed for introduction later in the meeting.

INVITATION FOR DISCUSSION (2 of 2)

Mayor Kerkeslager opened the meeting to the public for their opportunity to ask questions and make comments. The Mayor asked that, upon recognition by the Chair, the person shall proceed to the lectern and give his/her name and address in an audible tone of voice, and print the same on the sheet provided for the record. He/she shall limit his/her statement to three (3) minutes or less.

Eugene Zipper, Greenwood Road, gave suggestions for improving acoustics in the Council Chamber, such as moving the public chairs much closer to the Council table; the poor audio in this room has been allowed to persist. Mr. Zipper spoke of the Cablevision ordinance, which is non-exclusive, and reported his dissatisfaction with Cablevision’s airing of Council Meetings on the public access channel. Mr. Zipper spoke about the Land Development Ordinance regarding fees; he felt the fees would be passed on to the consumer by the developer, so was not in favor of the ordinance.

Sam Cerciello, Park Avenue, made lengthy statements critical of many aspects of the Fire & Police building project inside and outside; Mr. Mezzacca responded that the Borough is proceeding to get the building finished and will proceed to do whatever else needs to be done after that.

Mayor Kerkeslager announced that on Bottle Hill Day, the Borough plans to have an open house at the new Fire & Police building where the general public may come and see for themselves where we stand; so Mayor Kerkeslager encouraged everyone coming for Bottle Hill Day to go over to the new building that day.

Donald Brunner, Redmond Drive, thanked Mr. Codey for information on the towing fees; asked why the towing fees were raised; he was advised that the Police Department has to maintain availability of towers in town; the Borough raised the rates at the request of the Police Department because the State Police rates went up and that is the rate the towers receive elsewhere.

Jim McCloskey, Dean Street, mentioned that he comes to the Council meetings quite regularly, and complimented Mr. Elias on his statements as to thorough actions and investigations taken at the direction of the Mayor and Council in regard to the Fire & Police building. As to the subject of acoustics in the Council Chamber, the Mayor’s microphone works well and the audience can hear well; when Council Members speak into the microphones, they can be heard; he recommended another microphone at the lectern.

Advertised Hearings

The Clerk made the following statement:

Ordinance 59-2007 scheduled for hearing tonight was submitted in writing, was introduced by title and passed on first reading at a Regular Meeting of the Mayor and Council held on August 13, 2007; the balance of ordinances scheduled for hearing tonight were submitted in writing, introduced by title, and passed on first reading at a Regular Meeting of the Mayor and Council held on August 27, 2007; each was published in the Madison Eagle and made available to members of the general public requesting same.

 

The Mayor called up Ordinances for second reading and asked the Clerk to read said ordinances by title:

Introduced 08/13/2007

ORDINANCE 59-2007

 

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON AMENDING CHAPTER 195 OF THE MADISON BOROUGH CODE ENTITLED "LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON" TO REPLACE ARTICLE VIII, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 36-2007, ENTITLED "AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FEES"

 

  WHEREAS, the Madison Planning Board previously recommended that the Madison Land Development Ordinance be amended to provide for the collection of affordable housing development fees in regard to eligible development projects within the Borough; and

WHEREAS, the Borough Council adopted Ordinance 19-2005, modified by Ordinance 36-2007, which was codified as Article VIII of the Madison Borough Code entitled "Affordable Housing Development Fees", Section 195-46; and

WHEREAS, Ordinance 19-2005, as modified by Ordinance 36-2007, contained inconsistencies and did not fully comply with the provisions of N.J.A.C. 5:94-6.1 et seq.; and

WHEREAS, the Borough Attorney has recommended that the Borough adopt a replacement for Section 195-46 that will comply with the requirements of N.J.A.C. 5:94-6.1 et seq., and that such Ordinance shall be submitted to the Council on Affordable Housing for their approval pursuant to law.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Council of the Borough of Madison, County of Morris, State of New Jersey that:

SECTION 1: Article VIII, Section 195-46 of the Borough Code, entitled "Affordable Housing Development Fees" shall be completely replaced with the following:

 ARTICLE VIII

Affordable Housing Development Fees

 Section 195-46: Affordable Housing Development Fees

 A. Purpose.

(1) In Holmdel Builder’s Association V. Holmdel Township, 121 N.J. 550 (1990), the New Jersey Supreme Court determined that mandatory development fees are authorized by the Fair Housing Act of 1985, N.J.S.A. 52:27d-301 et seq., and the State Constitution, subject to the Council on Affordable Housing’s (COAH’s) adoption of rules. This ordinance establishes standards for the collection, maintenance, and expenditure of development fees pursuant to COAH’s rules. Fees collected pursuant to this ordinance shall be used for the sole purpose of providing low- and moderate-income housing. This ordinance shall be interpreted within the framework of COAH’s rules on development fees.

 

B. Basic requirements

 

(1) The Borough of Madison shall not spend development fees until COAH has approved a plan for spending such fees and the Borough of Madison has received third round substantive certification from COAH or a judgment of compliance.

 

C. Definitions

 

(1) The following terms, as used in this ordinance, shall have the following meanings:

 

(a) "Affordable housing development" means a development included in the Housing Element and Fair Share Plan, and includes, but is not limited to, an inclusionary development, a municipal construction project or a 100 percent affordable development.

 

(b) "COAH" means the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing.

 

(c) "Development fee" means funds paid by an individual, person, partnership, association, company or corporation for the improvement of property as permitted in COAH’s rules.

 

(d) "Equalized assessed value" means the value of a property determined by the municipal tax assessor through a process designed to ensure that all property in the municipality is assessed at the same assessment ratio or ratios required by law. Estimates at the time of issuance of a building permit may be obtained utilizing estimates for construction cost. Final equalized assessed value will be determined at project completion by the municipal tax assessor.

 

 

D. Residential Development fees

 

(1) Within all zoning districts(s) Developers of new residential housing, which shall include any residential development on an existing lot on which a former residential structure was located, within the Borough shall pay a fee of one percent of the equalized assessed value for residential development, provided no increased density is permitted.

 

(2) When an increase in residential density pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70d(5) (known as a "d" variance) has been permitted, developers may be required to pay a development fee of six percent of the equalized assessed value for each additional unit that may be realized. However, if the zoning on a site has changed during the two-year period preceding the filing of such a variance application, the base density for the purposes of calculating the bonus development fee shall be the highest density permitted by right during the two-year period preceding the filing of the variance application.

 

(3) No fee shall be charged pursuant to this section for any addition or improvement to an existing residential structure, so long as such addition or improvement does not increase the equalized assessed value of the existing structure, as of the date hereof, by more than 50%.

 

 

E. Non-residential Development fees

 

(1) Within the all zoning district(s), non-residential developers shall pay a fee of two percent of the equalized assessed value for non-residential development

 

(2) If an increase in floor area ratio is approved pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70d(4), then the additional floor area realized (above what is permitted by right under the existing zoning) will incur a bonus development fee of six percent of the equalized assessed value for non-residential development. However, if the zoning on a site has changed during the two-year period preceding the filing of such a variance application, the base floor area for the purposes of calculating the bonus development fee shall be the highest floor area permitted by right during the two-year period preceding the filing of the variance application.

 

 

 

F. Eligible exactions, ineligible exactions and exemptions

 

(1) Affordable housing developments shall be exempt from development fees. All other forms of new construction shall be subject to development fees unless exempted below.

 

(2) Developments that have received preliminary or final approval prior to the imposition of a municipal development fee shall be exempt from development fees unless the developer seeks a substantial change in the approval.

 

(3) Subject to the provisions of §195-46(D)(3), development fees shall be imposed and collected when an existing structure is expanded or undergoes a change to a more intense use. The development fee shall be calculated on the increase in the equalized assessed value of the improved structure.

 

(4) Developments that are providing for growth share or greater affordable housing pursuant to §195-48 and are subject to §195-48 shall not be subject to the development fee pursuant to this §195-46.

 

G. Collection of fees

 

(1) Fifty percent of the development fee will be collected at the time of issuance of the building permit. The remaining portion will be collected at the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The developer shall be responsible for paying the difference between the fee calculated at building permit and that determined at issuance of certificate of occupancy.

 

H. Contested fees

 

(1) Imposed and collected development fees that are challenged shall be placed in an interest bearing escrow account by the Borough of Madison. If all or a portion of the contested fees are returned to the developer, the accrued interest on the returned amount shall also be returned.

 

I. Affordable Housing trust fund

 

(1) There is hereby created a separate, interest-bearing housing trust fund for the purpose of depositing development fees collected from residential and non-residential developers and proceeds from the sale of units with extinguished controls. All development fees paid by developers pursuant to this ordinance shall be deposited into this fund.

 

(2) Within seven days from the opening of the trust fund account, the Borough of Madison shall provide COAH with written authorization, in the form of a three-party escrow agreement between the municipality, the bank, and COAH to permit COAH to direct the disbursement of the funds as provided for in N.J.A.C. 5:94-6.16(b).

 

(3) No funds shall be expended from the affordable housing trust fund unless the expenditure conforms to a spending plan approved by COAH. All interest accrued in the housing trust fund shall only be used on eligible affordable housing activities approved by COAH.

 

J. Use of funds

 

(1) Funds deposited in the housing trust fund may be used for any activity approved by COAH to address the municipal fair share. Such activities include, but are not limited to: rehabilitation, new construction, RCAs subject to the provisions of N.J.A.C. 5:94-4.4(d), ECHO housing, purchase of land for affordable housing, improvement of land to be used for affordable housing, purchase of housing, extensions or improvements of roads and infrastructure to affordable housing sites, financial assistance designed to increase affordability, or administration necessary for implementation of the Housing Element and Fair Share Plan. The expenditure of all funds shall conform to a spending plan approved by COAH.

 

(2) Funds shall not be expended to reimburse the Borough of Madison for past housing activities.

 

(3) After subtracting development fees collected to finance an RCA, a rehabilitation program or a new construction project that are necessary to address the Borough of Madison affordable housing obligation, at least 30 percent of the balance remaining shall be used to provide affordability assistance to low- and moderate-income households in affordable units included in the municipal Fair Share Plan. One-third of the affordability assistance portion of development fees collected shall be used to provide affordability assistance to those households earning 30 percent or less of median income by region.

 

(a) Affordability assistance programs may include down payment assistance, security deposit assistance, low interest loans, and rental assistance.

 

(b) Affordability assistance to households earning 30 percent or less of median income may include buying down the cost of low or moderate income units in the third round municipal Fair Share Plan to make them affordable to households earning 30 percent or less of median income. The use of development fees in this manner shall entitle the Borough of Madison to bonus credits pursuant to N.J.A.C. 5:94-4.22.

 

(c) Payments in lieu of constructing affordable units on site and funds from the sale of units with extinguished controls shall be exempt from the affordability assistance requirement.

 

(4) The Borough of Madison may contract with a private or public entity to administer any part of its Housing Element and Fair Share Plan, including the requirement for affordability assistance, in accordance with N.J.A.C. 5:94-7.

 

(5) No more than 20 percent of the revenues collected from development fees each year, exclusive of the fees used to fund an RCA, shall be expended on administration, including, but not limited to, salaries and benefits for municipal employees or consultant fees necessary to develop or implement a new construction program, a Housing Element and Fair Share Plan, and/or an affirmative marketing program. In the case of a rehabilitation program, no more than 20 percent of the revenues collected from development fees shall be expended for such administrative expenses. Administrative funds may be used for income qualification of households, monitoring the turnover of sale and rental units, and compliance with COAH’s monitoring requirements. Development fee administrative costs are calculated and may be expended at the end of each year or upon receipt of the fees.

 

K. Monitoring

 

(1) The Borough of Madison shall complete and return to COAH all monitoring forms included in the annual monitoring report related to the collection of development fees from residential and non-residential developers, payments in lieu of constructing affordable units on site, and funds from the sale of units with extinguished controls, and the expenditure of revenues and implementation of the plan certified by COAH. All monitoring reports shall be completed on forms designed by COAH.

 

L. Ongoing collection of fees

 

(1) The ability for the Borough of Madison to impose, collect and expend development fees shall expire with its substantive certification on December 31, 2014 unless the Borough of Madison has filed an adopted Housing Element and Fair Share Plan with COAH, has petitioned for substantive certification, and has received COAH’s approval of its development fee ordinance.  If the Borough of Madison fails to renew its ability to impose and collect development fees prior to December 31, 2014, it may resume the imposition and collection of development fees only by complying with the requirements of  N.J.A.C. 5:94-6.  The Borough of Madison shall not impose a development fee on a development that receives preliminary or final approval after the expiration of its substantive certification on December 31, 2014 nor will the Borough of Madison retroactively impose a development fee on such a development.  The Borough of Madison will not expend development fees after the expiration of its substantive certification on December 31, 2014.

 

SECTION 2: This ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.

Mayor Kerkeslager opened the hearing on the above ordinance and asked if anyone wished to be heard. Since no member of the public wished to be heard, the public hearing was closed.

Mrs. Vitale moved that Ordinance 59-2007, which the Clerk read by title, be finally adopted. Mr. Elias seconded the motion. Mr. Bowen was recognized by the Chair and expressed concerns and frustrations with sweeping state mandates that are largely outside of local control; therefore, he abstained as to approval of this ordinance. There was no further Council discussion and the motion passed with the following roll call vote recorded:

Yeas: Mrs. Holden, Ms. Baillie, Mrs. Vitale, Mr. Elias, Mr. Conley

Nays: None

Abstain: Mr. Bowen

Mayor Kerkeslager declared Ordinance 59-2007 adopted and finally passed and asked the Clerk to publish notice thereof in the newspaper and file the ordinance in accordance with the law.

Introduced 08/27/07

ORDINANCE 60-2007

 

ORDINANCE OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON AMENDING CHAPTER 34 OF THE BOROUGH CODE ENTITLED "POLICE DEPARTMENT" TO REORGANIZE THE COMPOSITION OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT

 

WHEREAS, the Borough Chief of Police has recommended that Chapter 34 of the Borough Code entitled "Police Department" be amended to reorganize the composition and staffing of the Police Department; and

WHEREAS, the Borough Council agrees with this recommendation.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Borough of Madison, in the County of Morris and State of New Jersey that Chapter 34 of the Borough Code entitled "Police Department" shall be amended as follows:

SECTION 1: Section 34-1 entitled "Department established; composition" is hereby amended to read as follows:

§ 34-1. Department established; composition.

 

The Police Department of the Borough of Madison is hereby established and shall consist of a Chief of Police, and shall have one Captain, and shall have not more than three Lieutenants, not more than six Sergeants, and not more than 25 Patrol Officers, provided the full number of police officers shall not exceed 36 including the Chief of Police, and not more than two Class II special police officers as the Borough Council may from time to time appoint as requested by the Chief of Police.

 

SECTION 2: This Ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.

Mayor Kerkeslager opened the hearing on the above ordinance and asked if anyone wished to be heard. Since no member of the public wished to be heard, the public hearing was closed.

Mr. Conley moved that Ordinance 60-2007, which the Clerk read by title, be finally adopted. Mrs. Holden seconded the motion. There was no Council discussion and the motion passed with the following roll call vote recorded:

Yeas: Mrs. Holden, Ms. Baillie, Mr. Bowen
Mrs. Vitale, Mr. Elias, Mr. Conley

Nays: None

Mayor Kerkeslager declared Ordinance 60-2007 adopted and finally passed and asked the Clerk to publish notice thereof in the newspaper and file the ordinance in accordance with the law.

Introduced 08/27/2007

ORDINANCE 61-2007

 

ORDINANCE OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON AMENDING CHAPTER 14 OF THE BOROUGH CODE REGARDING MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES

WHEREAS, the Borough of Madison adopted § 14-1 and § 14-2 of the Code of the Borough of Madison which provides for reimbursement of legal fees, in limited circumstances, to employees of the Borough who incur these expenses arising out of their employment with the Borough; and

 

WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the Borough to amend these sections in order to clarify the limitations and to provide that, in the event that the Borough indemnifies a municipal employee, the amount of such indemnification for attorneys fees shall be limited to a reasonable hourly rate not to exceed the hourly rate which the Borough compensates its Borough attorney.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Borough of Madison, in the County of Morris and State of New Jersey as follows:

 

(1) The last sentence of § 14-1 shall be replaced with: "The Borough Attorney or other attorney selected by the Borough Council shall represent the borough official or employee, at a cost not to exceed the hourly rate which the Borough compensates its Borough Attorney."

 

(2) Section 14-2 of the Code of the Borough of Madison shall be amended and replaced in its entirety as follows:

The Borough shall not defray the costs of defending any criminal action against any municipal employee except as may be authorized by state statute or other municipal ordinance or resolution of the Borough of Madison, and, in those circumstances, the responsibility for defraying the costs of defending such employee shall be applicable only when such criminal proceedings shall have been dismissed or result in a final disposition in favor of the employee. Further, in the event that the Borough indemnifies the employee, the cost of that indemnification shall not exceed the hourly rate paid to the Borough attorney. Nonetheless, should the Borough Council determine that there is good cause to dismiss the employee arising out of the incident or related incidents of the criminal prosecution, the Borough will not reimburse the employee or official for legal defense and costs of defending the suit, even though criminal proceedings against the employee may be dismissed or the employee found not guilty.

(3) Section 14-4 of the Code of the Borough of Madison shall be amended and replaced in its entirety as follows:

14-4. Definitions.

As used in this chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated:

OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE -- Any person elected, appointed or employed, paid or unpaid, in any way connected with the municipal government of the Borough of Madison, except for persons appointed to committees having no powers other than to advise. Employee shall include all persons on the municipal payroll.

(4) Repealer. All Ordinances or parts thereof in conflict or inconsistent with this Ordinance are hereby repealed, but only however, to the extent of such conflict or inconsistency, it being the legislative intent that all Ordinances or part of ordinances now existing or in effect unless the same being conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance shall remain in effect.

(5) Severability. The provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable and if any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof for any reason be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining sections, subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases of this Ordinance, but shall remaining in effect; it being the legislative intent that this Ordinance shall stand not withstanding the invalidity of any part.

(6) This Ordinance shall take effect upon passage and publication as provided by law.

(7) The Borough Clerk and the Borough Attorney are authorized and directed to change any Chapter, Article and/or Section numbers of the Code of the Borough of Madison, in the event that the codification of this Ordinance reveals that there is a conflict between the numbers and the existing Code, and in order to avoid confusion and possible accidental repealers of existing provisions not intended to be repealed.

 

Mayor Kerkeslager opened the hearing on the above ordinance and asked if anyone wished to be heard. Since no member of the public wished to be heard, the public hearing was closed.

Mr. Bowen moved that Ordinance 61-2007, which was read by title, be finally adopted. Ms. Baillie seconded the motion. There was no Council discussion and the motion passed with the following roll call vote recorded:

Yeas: Mrs. Holden, Ms. Baillie, Mr. Bowen
Mrs. Vitale, Mr. Elias, Mr. Conley

Nays: None

Mayor Kerkeslager declared Ordinance 61-2007 adopted and finally passed and asked the Clerk to publish notice thereof in the newspaper and file the ordinance in accordance with the law.

Introduction of Ordinances

The Clerk made the following statement:

Ordinances being introduced at this meeting will have a hearing at a Regular Meeting of the Council scheduled for September 24, 2007, at 7:45 p.m. or as soon as practical thereafter, except for Ordinance 64-2007, which will have a hearing at the Regular Meeting of the Council scheduled for Wednesday, October 10, 2007, at the same time and place of customary meetings of the Council, when interested parties will have an opportunity to be heard; each ordinance will be published, posted and made available to members of the public.

Mayor Kerkeslager called up ordinances for introduction and asked the Borough Clerk to read said ordinances by title:

ORDINANCE 62-2007

 

ORDINANCE OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON AMENDING CHAPTER 155 OF THE BOROUGH CODE ENTITLED "SEWERS"

 

 

 

BE IT ORDAINED, by the Municipal Council of the Borough of Madison as follows:

 

1. Article I, "CONNECTIONS," is amended and supplemented as follows:

 

A. Section 155-1. DEFINITIONS is hereby amended and supplemented to provide in its entirety as follows:

 

BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (BOD)- The quantity of oxygen, expressed in milligrams per liter (mg/l), utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter under standard laboratory procedure for five (5) days at twenty (20) degrees Celsius. The standard laboratory procedure shall be that found in the latest edition of "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater"; ASTM Standards, Part 23, Water; Atmospheric Analysis (1972); EPA Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (1971).

 

Chemical oxygen demand (COD) - Means a measure of the oxygen required to oxidize all compounds in water, both organic and inorganic (in milligrams per liter, mg/l) in a waste sample under specific conditions of an oxidizing agent, temperature and time as determined by analytical procedures set forth in the for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (USEPA, Office of Technology Transfer, Washington, D.C., March 1983).

 

CATEGORICAL STANDARD - Any limitation upon the discharge of pollutants adopted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to Section 307(b) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977.

 

COMPOSITE SAMPLE - See "Samples, Types of".

 

DISCHARGE - The action of pumping, leaching, releasing, spilling, leaking, pouring emitting, emptying, or dumping and also means the causing of permitting of any of the aforesaid.

 

DISPOSAL - The storage, treatment, utilization or processing and final disposition of septage.

 

FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS – Those establishments primarily engaged in activities of preparing, serving, or otherwise making available for consumption by the public such as restaurant, commercial, kitchen, caterer, hotel, school, hospital, prison, correctional facility, and care institution, These establishments use one or more of the following preparation activities: cooking by frying (all methods), baking (all methods), grilling, sautéing, rotisserie cooking, broiling (all methods), boiling, blanching, roasting, toasting, or poaching. Also include are infrared hearing, searing, barbecuing, and any other food preparation activity that produces a hot, non-drinkable food product in or on a receptacle that requires washing.

 

Governmental entity - Means a Federal, State, interstate agency, county or municipal government or school district whose jurisdiction is partially or entirely within the State.

 

GRAB SAMPLE - See "Samples, Types of".

 

HAZARDOUS POLLUTANT -

 

1. Any toxic pollutant;

 

2. Any hazardous substance as defined by the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act, N.J.S.A. 58:10-23.11; or

 

3. Any substance regulated as a pesticide under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. § 136 et seq.; or

 

4. Any substance the use or manufacture of which is prohibited under the Federal Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.; or

 

5. Any substance identified as a known carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer; or

 

6. Any hazardous waste designated pursuant to the New Jersey Solid Waste Management Act, N.J.S.A. 13:1E-1 et seq. or the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et seq.

 

IMMEDIATE ACCESS - Access without delay but in no event beyond ten minutes from the time the request for access is made by authorized Madison-Chatham Joint Meeting personnel to any employee of the User.

 

INDIRECT DISCHARGE - Any discharge into Madison-Chatham Joint Meeting’s domestic treatment works.

 

INDUSTRIAL USER - The term "Industrial User" means a source of discharge of industrial waste.

 

INDUSTRIAL WASTES - The liquid wastes from industrial manufacturing processes, as defined in the 1972 Edition of the "Standard Industrial Classification Manual", as distinct from sanitary sewage. Industrial wastes includes the leachate from landfills or other contaminated areas.

 

INHIBITORY POLLUTANT - Any pollutant which, when entering a domestic treatment works, in sufficient quantity will interfere with the treatment works’ physical, chemical, and/or biological processes.

 

INTERFERENCE - A Discharge which, alone or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, both:

 

1. Inhibits or disrupts the POTW, its treatment processes or operations, or its sludge processes, use or disposal; and

 

2. Therefore is a cause of a violation of any requirement of the POTW's NJPDES permit (including an increase in the magnitude or duration of a violation) or of the prevention of sewage sludge use or disposal in compliance with the following statutory provisions and regulations or permits issued thereunder (or more stringent State or local regulations): Section 405 of the Clean Water Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) (including Title II, more commonly referred to as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and including State regulations contained in any State sludge management plan prepared pursuant to Subtitle D of the SWDA), the Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, and the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act.

 

JOINT MEETING - The legal entity which owns or operates the Molitor Water Pollution Control Facility.

 

Local limits - Any restriction on quantities, quality, or concentrations of pollutants discharged into a local agency's treatment works, developed to prevent upset, interference, or pass-through of pollutants to the treatment works, and to protect worker health and safety, and protect/improve the quality of the sludge generated by the treatment works.

 

MCJM - Abbreviation for Madison-Chatham Joint Meeting

 

MG/L - Abbreviation for milligrams per liter.

 

NATIONAL PRETREATMENT STANDARD - "National Pretreatment Standard", "Pretreatment Standard," or "Standard" means any regulation containing pollutant discharge limits promulgated by the USEPA in accordance with section 307(b) and (c) of the Clean Water Act, which applies to Industrial Users. This term includes prohibitive discharge limits established pursuant to 40 CFR § 403.5.

 

NJPDES - The New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System or "NJPDES" means the New Jersey system for the issuance of permits pursuant to the Water Pollution Control Act.

 

NJDEP - The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

 

Non-contact cooling water - Water used to reduce temperature for the purpose of cooling. Such waters do not come into direct contact with any raw material, intermediate product (other than heat) or finished product. Non-contact cooling water may however contain algaecides, or biocides to control fouling of equipment such as heat exchangers, and/or corrosion inhibitors.

Oil and grease - Includes the nonpetroleum-based pollutants of animal and vegetable origin, and petroleum-based pollutants, which are analyzed by a USEPA and/or New Jersey State Certified Laboratory approved method for oil and grease referenced in 40 CFR Part 136, as amended, including subsequent amendments, and the petroleum-based pollutants analyzed by a USEPA and/or New Jersey State Certified Laboratory approved method for petroleum hydrocarbons cited in Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, USEPA, as amended.

 

OIL, GREASE AND SAND INTERCEPTOR OR TRAPS – A device designed and installed so as to separate and retain deleterious hazardous or undesirable matter from sanitary waste while permitting sanitary sewerage or liquid wastes to discharge into the drainage system by gravity.

 

PASS THROUGH - A Discharge which exits the POTW into waters of the United States or Waters of the State in quantities or concentrations which, alone or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, is a cause of a violation of any requirement of the POTW's NJPDES permit (including an increase in the magnitude or duration of a violation).

 

PERSON - Any individual, firm, company, partnership, corporation, association, group or society.

 

Petroleum hydrocarbons or petroleum-based oil and grease - The petroleum-based pollutants analyzed by an EPA and/or New Jersey State Certified Laboratory approved method for petroleum hydrocarbons cited in Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, USEPA, as amended.

 

pH - The logarithm of the reciprocal of the hydrogen-ion concentration. The concentration is the weight of the hydrogen-ions, in grams, per liter of solution.

 

POLLUTION - The condition of water resulting from the introduction therein of substances of any kind and in quantities rendering it detrimental or immediately or potentially dangerous to public health, or unfit for public or commercial use.

 

PRETREATMENT - The reduction of the amount of pollutants, the elimination of pollutants, or the alteration of the nature of pollutant properties in wastewater prior to or in lieu of discharging or otherwise introducing such pollutants into a POTW. The reduction or alteration may be obtained by physical, chemical or biological processes, process changes or by other means, except as prohibited by 40 CFR § 403.6(d). Appropriate pretreatment technology includes control equipment, such as equalization tanks or facilities, for protection against surges or slug loadings that might interfere with or otherwise be incompatible with the POTW. However, where wastewater from a regulated process is mixed in an equalization facility with unregulated wastewater or with wastewater from another regulated process, the effluent from the equalization facility must meet an adjusted pretreatment limit calculated in accordance with 40 CFR § 403.6(e).

 

PRETREATMENT REQUIREMENTS - Any substantive or procedural requirement related to Pretreatment, other than a National Pretreatment Standard, imposed on an Industrial User.

 

PRETREATMENT STANDARDS - Means all applicable Federal Rules implementing Section 307 of the Clean Water Act, as well as any non-conflicting State, or local standards. In cases of conflicting standards or regulations, the more stringent thereof shall apply.

 

Process wastewater - Any water which, during manufacturing or processing, comes into direct contact with or results from the production or use of any raw material, intermediate product, finished product, byproduct, or waste product. Process wastewater includes, but is not limited to, leachate and cooling water other than non-contact cooling water. This definition includes the terms commercial wastewater and industrial wastewater as used in 40 CFR Part 503.

 

"POTW" OR Publicly owned treatment works: Any device or system used in the storage and treatment (including recycling and reclamation) of municipal sewage or industrial wastes of a liquid nature which is owned by a State, municipality or political subdivision. This definition includes sewers, pipes, or other conveyances if they convey wastewater to a POTW providing treatment.

 

PUBLIC SEWER - See "Sewers, Types of".

 

Radioactive waste - Any waste which contains radioactive material in concentrations which exceed those listed in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2, or exceed the "Criteria for Identifying and Applying Characteristics of Hazardous Waste and for Listing Hazardous Waste" in 40 CFR Part 261, whichever is applicable.

 

SAMPLES, TYPES OF -

 

GRAB SAMPLE - "Grab sample" means an individual sample collected over a time period of less than 15 minutes.

COMPOSITE SAMPLE - "Composite sample" means a sample composed of several discrete samples combined in a known proportion. For wastewater monitoring, a composite sample is a sample composed of several discrete samples collected at equal time intervals, or proportionally to the flow rate of the discharge.

 

SANITARY SEWAGE - Means any liquid waste containing animal or vegetable matter in suspension or solution, or the water carried wastes resulting from the discharge of water closets, laundry tubs, washing machines, sinks, dishwashers, or any other source of water carried waste of human origin or containing putrescible material. The term specifically excludes industrial, hazardous or toxic wastes and materials.

 

SANITARY SEWER - See "Sewers, Types of".

 

Septage - The liquid and solid material pumped from a septic tank, cesspool, or similar domestic sewage treatment system, or a holding tank when the system is cleaned or maintained.

 

SEWAGE - means any wastes, including wastes from humans, households, commercial establishments, and industries that are discharged to or otherwise enter a sewage treatment works.

 

SEWER - A pipe or conduit that carries or is intended to carry wastewater or drainage water.

 

SEWER SYSTEM - All trunks, sub-trunks, sewers, interceptors, laterals, branches, and all other sewer appurtenances, whether privately owned or owned by the Borough of Madison, Borough of Chatham or the Madison-Chatham Joint Meeting, the sewage from which is delivered to the sewage treatment plant.

 

SEWERAGE SYSTEM - Any facility or extension thereof designed to provide for the collection, treatment or discharge of sewage. Also, see "Sewers, Types of".

 

SEWERAGE TREATMENT PLANT - An arrangement of devices and structures used for treating of sewage other than that used on and for a property under one ownership as an individual sanitary disposal system.

 

SEWERS, TYPES OF - An underground pipe or drain used to carry off water and waste matter as follows:

 

BRANCH SEWER - A sewer which receives wastewater from a relatively small area and discharges into a main sewer.

 

OUTFALL SEWER - A sewer which receives wastewater from a collecting system or treatment plant and carries it to a point of final discharge.

 

PUBLIC SEWER - A sewer owned or controlled by the Joint Meeting, a public utility, or other governmental agency.

 

SANITARY SEWER - A sewer that carries water carried wastes from residences, commercial building, industrial plants and institutions.

 

SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER-

 

1. The term Significant Industrial User means any user including, but not limited to, any significant industrial user as defined in 40 CFR 403.3(t) where:

 

i. The User is subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 CFR 403.6 and 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N;

 

ii. The User's average volume of process wastewater exceeds 25,000 gallons per day;

 

iii. The amount of BOD, COD or Suspended Solids in the industrial process wastewater discharge exceeds the mass equivalent of 25,000 gallons per day of the domestic waste;

 

iv. The volume of industrial process wastewater in the discharge exceeds five percent or more of the average daily dry weather flow of the Madison-Chatham Joint Meeting;

 

v. The User's discharge of process wastewater contributes, five percent or more of the daily mass loading of any of the pollutants listed in N.J.A.C. 7:14A-4, Appendix A Tables II through V;

 

vi. The User is designated as an Significant Industrial User by NJDEP on the basis that the User has a reasonable potential for adversely affecting the Madison-Chatham Joint Meeting’s operation;

 

vii. The User is designated as a Significant Industrial User by the NJDEP on the basis that the User has been in violation of any Federal, State, or local pretreatment standard or requirement, including, but not limited to, significant noncompliance as defined in 40 CFR 403.8(f)(2)(vii); or

 

viii. The NJDEP determines it would be consistent with the intent of Federal or State law or regulation to require a permit for the User.

 

SIGNIFICANT NONCOMPLIER - "Significant Noncomplier," "Significant Noncompliance" or "SNC" means any person who commits any of the violations described below, unless the NJDEP uses, on a case-by-case basis, a more stringent frequency or factor of exceedance to determine a significant noncomplier and the NJDEP states the specific reasons therefor, which may include the potential for harm to human health or the environment.

 

A. Violations which cause a person to become or remain an SNC under the state definition of significant noncomplier include:

 

1. A serious violation for the same pollutant, at the same discharge point source, in any two months of any consecutive six month period;

 

2. Exceedance of an effluent limitation expressed as a monthly average, for the same pollutant, at the same discharge point source, by any amount in any four months of any consecutive six month period;

 

3. If there is not an effluent limitation for a particular pollutant expressed as a monthly average, exceedance of the monthly average of the daily maximums for the effluent limitation, for the same pollutant, at the same discharge point source, by any amount in any four months of any consecutive six month period;

 

4. Any exceedance of an effluent limitation for pH by any amount, excluding the excursions specifically excepted by a permit issued by the NJDEP with continuous pH monitoring, at the same discharge point source in any four months of any consecutive six month period; or

 

5. Failure to submit a completed discharge monitoring report in any two months of any consecutive six month period.

 

B. Under the federal definition set forth at 40 CFR 403.8(f)(2)(vii), an Industrial User is in Significant Noncompliance if its violation meets one or more of the following criteria:

 

1. Chronic violations of wastewater discharge limits, defined here as those in which sixty-six percent or more of all of the measurements taken during a six-month period exceed (by any magnitude) the daily maximum limit or the average limit for the same pollutant parameter;

 

2. Technical Review Criteria (TRC) violations, defined here as those in which thirty-three percent or more of all of the measurements for each pollutant parameter taken during a six-month period equal or exceed the product of the daily maximum limit or the average limit multiplied by the applicable TRC (TRC=1.4 for BOD, SS, fats, oil, and grease, and 1.2 for all other pollutants except pH.

 

3. Any other violation of a pretreatment effluent limit (daily maximum or longer-term average) that the NJDEP determines has caused, alone or in combination with other discharges, interference or pass through (including endangering the health of POTW personnel or the general public);

 

4. Any discharge of a pollutant that has caused imminent endangerment to human health, welfare or to the environment or has resulted in the POTW's exercise of its emergency authority under 40 CFR 403.8(f)(1)(vi)(B) to halt or prevent such a discharge;

 

5. Failure to meet, within 90 days after the schedule date, a compliance schedule milestone contained in a local control mechanism or enforcement order for starting construction, completing construction, or attaining final compliance;

 

6. Failure to provide, within 30 days after the due date, required reports such as baseline monitoring reports, 90-day compliance reports, periodic self- monitoring reports, and reports on compliance with compliance schedules;

 

7. Failure to accurately report noncompliance;

 

8. Any other violation or group of violations which the NJDEP determines will adversely affect the operation or implementation of the pretreatment program.

 

Sludge - The solid residue and associated liquid resulting from the physical, chemical or biological treatment of domestic or industrial wastewaters.

Slug discharge - Any discharge of a non-routine, episodic nature, including, but not limited to, an accidental spill or a non-customary batch discharge.

 

STORM DRAIN OR STORM SEWER - A drain or sewer for conveying water, groundwater, subsurface water, or unpolluted water from any source.

 

Stormwater - Water resulting from precipitation (including rain and snow) that:

1. Runs off the land’s surface;

2. Is transmitted to the subsurface; or

3. Is captured by separate storm sewers or other sewerage or drainage facilities, or conveyed by snow removal equipment.

 

SUSPENDED SOLIDS, (SS) - Total suspended matter that either floats on the surface of, or is in suspension in water, wastewater or other liquids, and that is removable by laboratory filtering and prescribed in "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" and referred to as non-filterable residue.

 

SYSTEM - All trunks, interceptors, conduits, pipe lines, mains, pumping and ventilation stations, appurtenances, treatment or disposal systems, plants and works, outfalls, and all other structures and conveyances and real and tangible personal property acquired, constructed or operated by the Madison-Chatham Joint Meeting for the purposes of the Madison-Chatham Joint Meeting.

 

TREATMENT WORKS - Any device or systems, whether publicly or privately owned or operated, used in the storage, treatment, recycling, or reclamation of domestic or industrial waste of a liquid nature including intercepting sewers, outfall sewers, sewage collection systems, cooling towers, and ponds, pumping, power and other equipment and their appurtenances; extensions, improvements, remodeling, additions, and alterations thereof; and any other works including sites for the treatment process or for ultimate disposal of residues resulting from such treatment. Additionally, "treatment works" means any other method or system for preventing, abating, reducing, storing, treating, separating, or disposing of pollutants, or industrial waste in the sanitary sewer systems.

 

UNPOLLUTED WATER - Water of quality equal to or better than the effluent criteria in effect or water that would not cause violation of receiving water quality standards and would not be benefited by discharge to the sanitary sewers and wastewater treatment facilities provided.

 

USEPA - Abbreviation for the Environmental Protection Agency, an agency of the United States Government.

 

USER - Any individual, firm, company, partnership, corporations, association, group or society, which discharges wastewater into a treatment works.

 

WASTEWATER - A combination of the liquid and water carried wastes from residences, commercial buildings, industrial plants, and institutions.

 

WASTEWATER FACILITIES - The structures, equipment and processes required to collect, carry away and treat domestic and industrial wastes and dispose of the effluent.

 

WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS - An arrangement of devices and structures for treating wastewater, industrial wastes and sludge. Sometimes used as synonymous with "wastewater treatment plant" or "waste treatment plant" or "water pollution control plant."

 

 

B. Any provisions of this Section, 155.1 DEFINITIONS, as amended and supplemented that are inconsistent with the provisions of this amendment and supplement are hereby repealed.

 

######

 

2. ARTICLE II, "DISCHARGE OF WASTES," is hereby amended and supplemented as follows:

 

A. Section 155-8. ENUMERATION OF PROHIBITED DISCHARGES is hereby amended and supplemented as follows:

 

 

SECTION 155.8 PROHIBITED WASTES AND SEWER USE

 

A. GENERAL PROHIBITIONS

 

No person shall discharge, deposit, cause or allow to be deposited or discharged into the MCJM wastewater facilities and wastewater treatment works or public sewer, any substance, wastewater or pollutant which may cause pass through or interference or that will:

 

1. Not be susceptible to treatment or will interfere with the process or efficiency of the treatment system, or will exhibit inhibitory toxicity in the treatment system;

 

2. Violate State or Federal Statutes, Rules or Regulations or Pretreatment standards as the same may be promulgated from time to time;

 

3. Cause the MCJM facilities to violate State or Federal Statutes, Rules or Regulations or Pretreatment standards as the same may be promulgated from time to time, the MCJM NJPDES Permit, applicable receiving water standards, MCJM’s permit regulating sludge which is produced during the treatment process or any other permit issued to the MCJM.

 

B. SPECIFIC PROHIBITIONS

 

No person shall discharge, deposit, cause or allow to be deposited or discharged into the MCJM wastewater facilities, wastewater treatment works or public sewer, any substance, wastewater or pollutant which contains the following:

 

1. Storm waters, surface water, groundwater, roof runoff, swimming pool water, sub-surface drainage, foundation, floor drain or basement sump drainage, pond water, non-contact cooling water or unpolluted industrial wastes.

 

2. Any liquid containing fats, wax, grease, or oils, either emulsified or not, in excess of 100 mg/1 of solvent soluble materials or containing substances which may solidify or become viscous at temperatures between 32 and 140 degrees F. (0 degrees and 60 degrees C.).

 

3. The discharge of petroleum hydrocarbons in excess of 100 mg/L monthly average or 150 mg/L daily maximum as set forth at N.J.A.C. 7:14A-21.2(a) is prohibited.

 

4. Any residues from petroleum storage, refining or processing; waste fuels, lubricants, solvents, or paints.

 

5. Any wastewater containing any liquids, solids or gases which, by reason of their nature or quantity are, or may be, sufficient either alone or by interaction with other substances to create an explosive, flammable or combustible atmosphere in any part of the MCJM wastewater facilities or wastewater treatment works, including, but not limited to wastestreams with a closed cup flashpoint of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit or 60 degrees Centigrade using the test methods specified in 40 CFR 261.21.

 

6. Any solid or viscous substance in quantities or of such size capable of causing obstruction to the flow in sewers or interference with the proper operation of the MCJM wastewater facilities or wastewater treatment works, such as, but not limited to, mud, straw, metal, rags, glass, tar, plastics, wood and shavings, ashes, cinders, sand, feathers, whole blood, paunch manure, hair and fleshing, entrails, paper or plastic containers, etc.

 

7. Any ground or un-ground garbage, either from a commercial garbage disposal units or any other source, except residential garbage disposal systems.

 

8. Any pollutant, including oxygen demanding pollutants (Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Chemical Oxygen Demand, etc.) released in a Discharge at a flow rate and/or pollutant concentration which will cause Interference with the MCJM wastewater facilities or wastewater treatment works.

 

9. Heat in amounts which will inhibit biological activity in the MCJM wastewater facilities or wastewater treatment works resulting in Interference, but in no case heat in such quantities that the temperature at said wastewater facilities or wastewater treatment works exceeds 40oC (104oF) unless alternate temperature limits are approved.

 

10. Petroleum oil, non-biodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will cause interference or pass through.

 

11. Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapors, or fumes within the MCJM wastewater facilities, wastewater treatment works or public sewer in a quantity that may cause acute worker health and safety problems.

 

12. Any waste having a pH lower than 5 or higher than 9 or having any other corrosive property capable of causing damage or hazard to structures, equipment and personnel of the MCJM.

 

13. Any radioactive waste or isotope of such half-life or concentration as to be in excess of that permitted by appropriate regulatory agencies having control over their use or in such quantity as to cause damage or hazard to structures, equipment, personnel of the Borough of Madison, Borough of Chatham or MCJM, the wastewater facilities or wastewater treatment works.

 

14. Any waste containing phenols, noxious or malodorous solids, liquids or gases, which either singly or by interaction with other wastes, are capable of creating a public nuisance or hazard to life, or are or may be sufficient to prevent entry into a sewer for its maintenance and repair.

 

15. Any wastewater containing toxic pollutants or other substances which may, in sufficient quantity, cause injury, damage or hazard to personnel, structures or equipment, or interference with the MCJM wastewater facilities, wastewater treatment works, public sewer system or any portion of the liquid or solids treatment or handling processes, or that may pass through the treatment facilities in such condition that it may not achieve State, Federal or other existing requirements for the effluent or for the receiving waters. Except as permitted under Section 155.8.2 Local Limits, the following chemicals are specifically prohibited: alcohols, aldehydes, arsenic, and arsenicals, bromine, chlorinated hydrocarbons, compounds with chlorine demands in excess of 100 ppm, chromium or chromium compounds, copper and copper salts, creosol, cyanide or cyanide compounds, fluorine, iodine, mercury or mercury compounds, nickel and nickel compounds, pesticides, silver and silver compounds, sulfonamide, toxic dyes (organic or mineral), zinc and zinc compounds or other heavy metals; all strong oxidizing agents such as peroxide, chromates, dichromate, permanganates, etc., compounds producing hydrogen sulfide or any other toxic inflammable or explosive gases, either upon acidification, alkalization, reduction or oxidation; strong reducing agents such as nitrates, sulfites, sulfides; strong acids or strong alkalis, except to the extent set forth herein.

 

16. Any material which exerts or causes:

 

a. Unusual concentrations of inert Suspended Solids (such as, but not limited to, Fuller's earth, lime slurries and lime residues) or of dissolved solids (such as, but not limited to, sodium chloride and sodium sulfate).

b. Excessive discoloration (such as, but not limited to, dye solutions and vegetable tanning solutions) which cannot be removed by the wastewater treatment works. In no case shall a discolored discharge be permitted if, in the opinion of the MCJM, said discharge is likely to interfere with the operation of the wastewater treatment system or to cause a violation of the facility's NJPDES permit, applicable water quality criteria, or sludge disposal regulations.

 

c. Unusual BOD, COD, or chlorine requirements in such quantities as to constitute an unacceptable load or interference on the MCJM wastewater facilities or wastewater treatment works.

 

d. Any unusual volume of flow or concentration of wastes constituting a "slug" of such volume or strength so as to cause a treatment process upset and subsequent loss of treatment efficiency.

 

17. Septage or wastes from septic tanks, cesspools or other such sources of sanitary sewage.

 

18. Any water added for the purpose of diluting wastes which would otherwise exceed applicable maximum concentration limits.

 

 

SECTION 155.8.1 CATEGORICAL STANDARDS

 

No person shall discharge, deposit, cause or allow to be deposited or discharged into the wastewater facilities wastewater treatment works of the MCJM, or public sewer any waste which violates applicable categorical standards. As pretreatment standards for toxic or other industrial wastes are promulgated by the USEPA for a given category of Industrial User, all Industrial Users shall conform to the USEPA timetable for complying with applicable discharge limitations. Notwithstanding anything set forth herein, an Industrial User shall comply with all Local Limits and any more stringent standards which are established by the MCJM or other regulatory agencies. Changes and additions may be implemented as necessary from time to time by resolution of the MCJM or ordinance of the Borough. Categorical standards can be modified only through the Federal regulatory mechanisms available pursuant to 40 CFR 403.7.

 

SECTION 155.8.2 LOCAL LIMITS

 

{RESERVED}

 

SECTION 155.8.3 COMPLIANCE DETERMINATION

 

A. Compliance determinations with respect to any conformance with ordinances or permit conditions or limitations may be made on the basis of instantaneous grab samples, sequential grab samples, or composite samples. Sequential grab samples or composite samples may be taken over a 24-hour period, or any other time span, as deemed necessary by the NJDEP, to meet the requirements of a specific situation.

 

B. Whenever it shall be necessary for the purpose of these general sewer use requirements, authorized representatives of the MCJM, NJDEP, USEPA or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction may, upon presentation of credentials, enter upon the premises of any User as follows:

 

1. During business hours, on notice to authorized personnel of the User, but without the necessity of a warrant, for the purposes of inspecting, copying or photographing any records required to be kept.

 

2. At any time without a warrant or prior notice for the purpose of installing or inspecting any monitoring equipment or method, inspecting the process wastewater pretreatment facility, and/or measuring, sampling and/or testing any discharge of wastewater either from process wastewater pretreatment facilities or the point of discharge to the MCJM wastewater facilities or wastewater treatment works. The User shall instruct security personnel to provide immediate access to such representatives upon presentation of valid credentials at any hour and under any and all circumstances. The User's security personnel will be entitled to accompany the entering representatives.

 

3. Any temporary or permanent obstruction to safe and easy access to the facility to be inspected and/or sampled shall be promptly removed by the User at the written or verbal request of the MCJM and shall not be replaced. The costs of clearing such access shall be born by the User.

 

4. Immediate access shall be granted to authorized representatives of the MCJM, NJDEP, USEPA or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction upon presentation of valid credentials. Unreasonable delays in allowing access to the User's premises shall be a violation of this ordinance.

 

C. Each User shall reimburse the MCJM for the actual costs incurred by the MCJM for such monitoring, sampling, investigation, engineering evaluation, administrative costs, legal or other services which are necessary or appropriate, in addition to those services which are minimally required and which are properly allocable to the User’s operation. Payment for such expenses shall be made by the User within ten (10) days after the submission of an invoice by the MCJM.

 

SECTION 155.8.4 EMERGENCY SUSPENSIONS

 

A. Upon advance notice to the Borough Administrator and the Health Officer, the Superintendent of the MCJM may immediately suspend a user's discharge, after informal notice to the user, whenever such suspension is necessary to stop an actual or threatened discharge which reasonably appears to present or cause an imminent or substantial endangerment to the health or welfare of persons. Upon advance notice to the Borough Administrator and the Health Officer,the Superintendent of the MCJM may also immediately suspend a user's discharge, after notice and opportunity to respond, that threatens to interfere with the operation of the POTW, which presents, or may present, an endangerment to the environment, or for noncompliance with pretreatment standards and requirements.

B. Any user notified of a suspension of its discharge shall immediately stop or eliminate its contribution. In the event of a user's failure to immediately comply voluntarily with the suspension order, and upon advance notice to the Borough Administrator and the Health Officer, the Superintendent may take such steps as deemed necessary, including immediate severance of the sewer connection, to prevent or minimize damage to the POTW, its receiving stream, or endangerment to any individuals. The Superintendent of the MCJM and/or the NJDEP may allow the user to recommence its discharge when the user has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Superintendent and/or the NJDEP that the period of endangerment has passed.

 

SECTION 155.8.5 AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO GENERAL PROHIBITIONS

 

A User shall have an affirmative defense to an enforcement action brought against it for noncompliance with the General Prohibitions in Section 155.8, if it can prove that it did not know, or have reason to know, that its discharge, alone or in conjunction with discharges from other sources, would cause Pass Through or cause Interference and that either:

 

A. A local limit exists for each pollutant discharged and the User was in compliance with each limit directly prior to, and during, the Pass Through or Interference; or

 

B. No local limit exists, but the discharge did not change substantially in nature or constituents from the User's prior discharge when the MCJM was regularly in compliance with its NJPDES permit, and in the case of Interference, was in compliance with applicable sludge use or disposal requirements.

 

SECTION 155.8.6 NOTIFICATION OF CHANGED CONDITIONS

 

Each User must notify the Superintendent of the MCJM, and obtain prior written approval, at least ten (10) days in advance of any planned significant changes to the User's operations or system which might alter the nature, quality, or volume of its wastewater, or result in the User meeting the definition of Significant Indirect User established at N.J.A.C. 7:14A-1.2, or of any substantial change in the volume or character of pollutants in their discharge. The MCJM reserves the right to deny or condition new or increased contributions of pollutants, or changes in the nature of pollutants, where such contributions do not meet applicable Pretreatment Standards and Requirements or where such contributions would cause the MCJM to violate its NJPDES permit.

 

A. The Superintendent may require the User to submit such information as may be deemed necessary to evaluate the changed condition.

 

For purposes of this requirement, significant changes include, but are not limited to, flow increases of twenty percent (20%) or greater, and the discharge of any previously unreported pollutants.

 

SECTION 155.8.7 NOTIFICATION OF SLUG DISCHARGES

 

A. An Industrial User shall immediately notify the MCJM of any incident of accidental or slug discharge. The notification shall include the location of the discharge, type of waste, concentration and volume.

 

B. An Industrial User shall take immediate action to contain and minimize the accidental or slug discharge so as to prevent interference with the treatment process, damage to the treatment system, and pass through to the receiving stream or contamination of the sludge.

 

C. Within five (5) days following accidental and or slug discharge, the Industrial User shall submit to the NJDEP and MCJM a detailed written report describing the date, time and cause of the discharge, the quantity and characteristics of the discharge and corrective action taken at the time of the discharge, and the measures to be taken by the user to prevent similar future occurrences. Such notification shall not relieve the user of any expense, loss, damage or other liability which may be incurred as a result of damage to treatment system, fish kills, or any other damage to person or property; nor shall such notification relieve the user of any fines, civil penalties or other liability which may be imposed by any permit or other applicable law.

 

SECTION 155.8.8 NOTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT INDIRECT USER STATUS

 

The MCJM shall notify the NJDEP at least annually which facilities within the sewer service area meet the definition of Significant Indirect User as set forth at N.J.A.C. 7:14A-1.2. The MCJM may use a variety of sources to identify SIUs including, but not limited to user surveys, existing MCJM files, water use and billing records, utility company records, sewer connection permits, business license records, Chamber of Commerce rosters, the local telephone directory, property tax records, industrial directories, newspapers, advertisements, world wide web, and drive-bys. Once a potential discharger has been identified, the MCJM may, if it is uncertain of the operations of that facility, send the user a questionnaire in order to better evaluate the users' potential of being classified as an SIU.  Alternatively, the MCJM may conduct inspections of some or all such facilities.

SECTION 155.8.9 INDEMNIFICATION

The Industrial User shall indemnify and save harmless the MCJM for any expense, loss or damage occasioned the MCJM, by reason of permit violation, the discharge of process wastewater or any prohibited substance, including, but not limited to the following:

 

A. Any cost incurred by the MCJM in removing, correcting, preventing or terminating any adverse effects upon the MCJM wastewater facilities or wastewater treatment works;

 

B. Any increase in the cost of sludge processing or disposal;

 

C. Any fines or penalties assessed against the MCJM for such violations of its permits;

 

D. The reasonable costs of any investigative inspection or monitoring survey which leads to the establishment of a violation of a NJPDES Significant Indirect User Permit and the reasonable costs of preparing and litigating any action successfully concluded against the User for such violation; and

 

E. Any other actual or compensatory damages to the MCJM resulting from the discharge.

 

B. Any provisions of this Section 155.8 PROHIBITED WASTES as amended and supplemented that are inconsistent with this amendment and supplement are hereby repealed.

 

C. Section 155-9. REQUIRED GREASE AND OIL SEPARATORS is hereby amended in its entirety. It shall now read as follows:

 

SECTION 155.9 GREASE, OIL AND SAND INTERCEPTORS OR TRAPS

 

A. Grease, oil and sand interceptors or traps shall be provided for the proper handling of liquid wastes containing grease in excessive amounts or any flammable wastes, sand and other harmful ingredients for all Food Establishments and when in the Opinion of the Plumbing Code Official or Health Officer, except that such interceptors shall not be required for private living quarters or dwelling units. All interceptors shall be of a type and capacity approved by the Plumbing Code Official and designed in accordance with Standard PDI-G 101 entitled, "Testing and Rating Procedure for Type 1 Hydro Mechanical Grease Interceptors with Appendix of Installation and Maintenance" and shall be located as to be readily and easily accessible for cleaning and inspection.

 

B. Grease and oil interceptors shall be constructed of impervious materials capable of withstanding abrupt and extreme changes in temperature. They shall be of substantial construction, watertight and equipped with easily removable covers which, when bolted in place, shall be gastight and watertight.

 

C. Where installed, all grease, oil and sand interceptors or traps shall be maintained by the owner, at his or her expense, in continuously efficient operation at all times. The User shall be responsible for the maintenance of said interceptor(s) or traps and for the removal and disposal of the captured material and shall maintain records of the dates and means of disposal. All interceptors or traps shall be in conformance with applicable plumbing code requirements.

 

D. Where installed, all grease and oil interceptors or traps shall be inspected every six months by the Health Department and provisions of Section 155-9 shall be enforced by the Health Department. Failure to maintain grease interceptors or traps in a satisfactory manner will result in notification of said condition by the inspecting officer. The owner shall have five (5) days to correct routine maintenance violations, and ten (10) days to effect mechanical repairs, from the date of written notice, or shall be subject to the violations and penalties more fully set forth in § 155.10 of this article.

 

E. Application fees, inspection fees, and use fees for grease, oil and sand interceptors or traps shall be paid to the Borough in accordance with the applicable rate schedule.

 

F. This provisions of this Section 155.9 shall be graced and shall not become effective until one year after the date of enactment of the Ordinance herein.

 

D. Any provisions of this Section 155.9 GREASE, OIL AND SAND INTERCEPTORS OR TRAPS as amended that are inconsistent with this amendment are hereby repealed.

 

 

This Ordinance is deemed severable and if any part or provisions is deemed invalid, the reminder shall continue in full force and effect.

This Ordinance, with the exception of Section 155.9, shall take effect upon passage, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection approval and publication as provided by law.

Mr. Bowen commented that he felt strongly that the ordinance be introduced as it was presented to the Council. Mrs. Holden explained her wish to change wording with a motion.

Mrs. Holden moved that wording be changed from "may" to "shall" in Section 155-9 (D) of Ordinance 62-2007. Ms. Baillie seconded the motion. Mr. Bowen asked to amend the motion to have inspections "every six months" rather than "quarterly", for which there was general support; Mrs. Holden modified the motion to move both amendments, which Ms. Baillie seconded. At the conclusion of discussion, the amendments were adopted as follows to Ordinance 62-2007:

 

…………..

Section 155-9 (D). Where installed, all grease and oil interceptors or traps may shall be inspected quarterly every six months by the Health Department and the provisions of Section 155-9 shall be enforced by the Health Department………..

The following roll call vote was recorded adopting the above amendments:

Yeas: Mrs. Holden, Ms. Baillie, Mr. Bowen
Mrs. Vitale, Mr. Elias, Mr. Conley

Nays: None

Mr. Bowen moved adoption of Ordinance 62-2007 as amended. Mrs. Vitale seconded the motion. There was no Council discussion and the motion passed with the following roll call vote recorded:

Yeas: Mrs. Holden, Ms. Baillie, Mr. Bowen
Mrs. Vitale, Mr. Elias, Mr. Conley

Nays: None

ORDINANCE 63-2007

 

ORDINANCE OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON APPROPRIATING $229,876.72 FROM THE GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR INTER-BOROUGH NETWORK HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE

WHEREAS, the Network Administrator has recommended that the Borough appropriate $229,876.72 from the General Capital Improvement Fund for purchase of networking hardware for the Fire and Police Building and revision of the Borough computer network; and

WHEREAS, the Director of Finance has attested to the availability of the funds in the General Capital Improvement Fund in an amount not to exceed $229,876.72 for this purpose; and

WHEREAS, the Borough Council has determined that the Borough should appropriate $229,876.72 from the General Capital Improvement Fund for purchase of networking hardware for the Fire and Police Building and revision of the Borough computer network; and

WHEREAS, Ordinance 36-2005 appropriated $105,777.00 from the General Capital Improvement Fund for server upgrades which were not previously implemented and therefore a subsequent Resolution will be adopted canceling Ordinance 36-2005; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Borough of Madison, in the County of Morris and State of New Jersey, as follows:

SECTION 1: The amount of $229,876.72 is hereby appropriated from the General Capital Improvement Fund for purchase of networking hardware for the Fire and Police Building and revision of the Borough computer network.

SECTION 2: The budget of the Borough is hereby amended to conform with the provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.

 

Mrs. Holden moved that Ordinance 63-2007, which the Clerk read by title, be adopted. Mrs. Vitale seconded the motion. This inter-Borough network hardware and software investment has been planned for many years. There was no Council discussion and the motion passed with the following roll call vote recorded:

Yeas: Mrs. Holden, Ms. Baillie, Mr. Bowen
Mrs. Vitale, Mr. Elias, Mr. Conley

Nays: None

ORDINANCE NO. 64-2007

Hearing Wednesday, October 10, 2007

ORDINANCE OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON GRANTING MUNICIPAL CONSENT FOR THE OPERATION OF A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM WITHIN THE BOROUGH OF MADISON, NEW JERSEY TO CSC TKR, INC.

BOROUGH OF MADISON

 

ORDINANCE NO. 64-2007

 

ORDINANCE OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON GRANTING MUNICIPAL CONSENT FOR THE OPERATION OF A CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM WITHIN THE BOROUGH OF MADISON, NEW JERSEY TO CSC TKR, INC.

 

WHEREAS, the governing body of the Borough of Madison (hereinafter referred to as the "Borough") determined that CSC TKR, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "the Company" or "Cablevision") had the technical competence and general fitness to operate a cable television system in the Borough, and by prior ordinance granted its municipal consent for Cablevision to obtain a non-exclusive franchise for the placement of facilities and the establishment of a cable television system in the Borough; and

 

WHEREAS, by application for renewal consent filed with the Borough and the Office of Cable Television on or about April 9, 2007, Cablevision has sought a renewal of the franchise; and

 

WHEREAS, the Borough having held public hearings has made due inquiry to review Cablevision’s performance under the Franchise, and to identify the Borough’s future cable-related needs and interests and has concluded that Cablevision has substantially complied with its obligations under the Franchise and has committed